I am a massive board game nerd.
I love games in general... but board games are a tactile experience that allows me to step away from a computer screen or television screen and decompress in a way that I can't get from a video game. There's just something that comes out of opening up a box and taking out the pieces that really hit for me.
The problem being that board games are expensive, yo.
I shudder to think of how much money I've spent on my collection. It's undoubtedly way too much.
Before I get into everything, I think it's important to tell you what my favorite board game of all time is. And that game is Sorry!. Yes, you read that right, Sorry!...

Based on the board game Ludo which is based on the game Parcheesi (which is called Pachisi in the original Indian), Sorry! is a race home for your four pieces. But there are cards which do more than simply move you along a track. 4's move you backwards. 7's can be split between two pieces. 11's allow you two trade places with another player's piece. And the titular Sorry card sends another player back to the start while you get to take their place with one go your start pieces.
The game is frickin' brilliant. And deceptively simple. It's luck-driven based on the cards you turn, but there's a definite strategy element which makes it more than just a mundane Chutes and Ladders experience. Knowing how to play a card can be very much more important than what cards you get. And it's crazy fun because the game can turn on a dime. You can be way ahead one minute, then bumped to last place the next.
The design of the game has changed several times since I first started playing it as a kid. I own three versions of it, with my favorite being the 1972 version (pictured above) that I still have (the first version I ever played).
The current version looks like something exploded...

I rather like the bold, vibrant design... except for the color slides, which look awful and would be so much better if they were the colored solid so the "You can't slide on your own color" rule is easier to observe (instead you have to look at the three colors available then determine if you can slide, which is madness). But oh well. Times are always changing.
What doesn't change is that I still love Sorry! in all its incarnations.
Tune in tomorrow for more board game nonsense.
Alrighty then. Yesterday I fully admitted that my favorite board game of all time is Sorry! no matter what new hotness comes along. Now I'm going to be diving into the kind of games that are not 100 years-old (well, 97 years-old, but you get the idea).
My favorite games work great for two-player. Games with a low player count move quickly, allow chit-chat that doesn't interrupt the game, and seem more casual the less players are involved (even when it's not a co-op game, because even the most cutthroat games can be casual and fun with just you and somebody you know well).
That being said, games that are either designed for solo play or have very good solo play are mostly what I'm looking for. Mostly because it's tough to find other people wanting to play when I'm wanting to decompress after work. If you're lucky you can find somebody available on the weekend, but it's never guaranteed, so buying for solo play is always a good move if you want to game on your own schedule.
Most solo games are a "beat your own score" version of multi-player where you face off against an automa. And that's fine. I treat them like puzzles where I'm trying to figure something out. Other solo games come out of co-op modes where you can play on your own or play multi-handed.
Whichever way it shakes out, a good game is a good game. And here are some of my favorites...
Marvel United is also great because the game pieces are so fantastic (all 350+ of them!)...

"There's only one Blade, and there's only ever gonna BE one Blade!"

I could go on and on, but that's probably more than enough to give you an idea of what I like to play (if you want to see more, just visit my collection on Board Game Geek).
The downside of board games is that you have to set them up to play then tear them down when you're done. For some games, this is a monumental undertaking because there's loads of parts and pieces needed to play. It's even worse if you have a game which takes several play sessions before you can complete it... and you have cats. Leaving a game out on my dining room table and expecting everything to still be in the same place come morning is insane in my house. Jake and Jenny would destroy it. Not out of malice... but out of fun.
Because it's a game after all.
It's because of cats that I've long wanted a gaming table. Which is to say a dining room table where you can remove the top and have a play area underneath. That way you can uncover and play whenever you like and not risk any cat-related tragedies.
The problem is that gaming tables like this have historically cost $1,500 or more for a decent one. The one I had my eye on was $2,400. Which might as well be $10,000, and I can't possible spend that kind of money for games.
Then I saw a game table on Amazon which looked to be very good quality... at a fraction of the price. So I took a chance and ordered it.
And it was indeed shockingly high quality. Not for the price, but shockingly high quality period.
But it arrived damaged.
Surprisingly, the company I purchased it from shipped me a replacement top! And here it is...

In the photo I am playing a small game, so I only uncovered half the table. For larger games or many players, you can uncover all of it. The thing even came with a bunch of cup holders which attach to the side for drinks or snacks!
I am very, very pleased with it. And it makes a great impression when friends show up to play.
Which is why I ordered the smaller coffee table version for my living room, so I can set up solo games for myself while watching television...

Meaning I have two gaming tables in my home now! Can you believe it?
Take it from me, people... dreams really can come true.
Board games are insanely expensive in several ways.
They used to be a cheap for of entertainment, costing $15 to $20... or maybe up to $35 if they are large or fancy. But now? They're so large and complicated that $45 to $55 is considered normal, and many games go for $100 or more. Because of this, I have tried to not buy so many new games.
Tried and failed.
Because unless it's some kind of legacy game (like Monopoly), games do not stay in print. Most games don't. They come, maybe get a second or third printing if they're extremely popular, then go. So if you miss picking up a game when it's released, you may never get a chance again without paying astronomical prices on the third-party market.
Take for example, Marvel Champions. This is a game that I bought years after it was first released in 2019. Then I forgot about it... only finally playing it a couple years ago. At which point I discovered I loved it. Problem is, the publisher hasn't reprinted the loads of "hero packs" and expansions that got released, and the only way to find them is off eBay where people are charging insane prices. The Doctor Strange hero pack goes for $200... assuming you can find one for sale. I wanted to pick up Gambit, but he was $340. Other rare heroes aren't available anywhere for any price. It's insanity.
And for that reason if I find a game that looks even remotely interesting, I will either back it's Kickstarter or GameFound campaign... or purchase it in a store... rather than waiting and having to pay double or triple if it sells out and doesn't get a reprint.
My obsession with getting every piece of the Marvel United games, expansions, and upgrades has cost me a pretty penny indeed. Had I only known how much I'd love collecting and playing it, I would have been able to buy it all for 25%-35% the cost I ended up paying.
And so I end up spending more money than I should to save money. Potentially.
At least that's what I tell myself.
And because board games are so crazy expensive and there's so bloody many of them, I watch a lot of YouTubers and other social media. And because I'm mostly interested in how a game plays solo, I am usually watching solo play channels and reading solo play sites. Here's some of my favorites...
Green
Esmerelda makes videos about things that make her happy. Which, from what I can see, are board games she can play solo. She seems a lovely person who has a pleasant presentation which I love. Because she's in the Netherlands, some of the games she plays are unavailable here (or no longer available), which is a bummer... but I've snagged a few of them I've seen on eBay. Others I've bought at various game stores local and online. Like this Carcassonne variant that looks fantastic...
Stidjen Plays Solo
Probably the one board game reviewer whom has the most compatibility with me when it comes to games I like. He's gotten me to buy a lot of games!
Tabletop Turtle
I really, really like Mike and Kim's take on games... even though I don't always agree with them. Mike has a pretty good take on solo games, but it feels as though he doesn't play solo very often...
Stephen & Zeshawn
Stephen Callaghan owns House Rules Games in Dallas and does social media for his shop. Zeshawn Khan has a social media channel called Board & Shield because he loves games. And both of those channels are worth watching. But my favorites are when they crossover...
Rolling Solo
This YouTube channel has a good user community built around board game solo play.
Specifically Solo
Another YouTube channel which has loads of content built around solo play.
Room and Board
Chris George is a highly entertaining YouTuber who has a unique take on board gaming, with a lot of interesting content around the hobby (not just reviews). And his play-throughs with Zach are legendary...
Totally Tabled
Mostly solo play content, but also has a lot of list videos if you're looking for new games to try or buy!
True Solo Studios
A fairly new channel with solo board game play content by Josh.
slickerdrips
Tom has a pleasant play manner that makes his videos a nice watch. Mostly solo board game play.
Sir Thecos
A lot of solo game content that's exceptionally well-presented.
One more day left...
And here we are at the end of Board Game Week at Blogography.
I've talked about my favorite games, investing in gaming tables, and what social media I watch in order to keep up to date on board games (in general) and solo play (specifically). So now I guess the only thing that's left is to talk about where I store all these games I've been collecting for the past decades of my life.
The answer until recently was "In a bunch of boxes in my garage."
But then I started buying them again, and decided I needed a better place to keep them. And so I found an alcove in my guest bedroom that's a hop, skip, and a jump from my dining room gaming table, and decided to build some shelves to go in there. Which actually turned out quite nice...

I've wanted to do this for a while, but wood is so frickin' expensive that I couldn't afford it. But then I found some old IKEA shelves stacked up in the back of my garage that I forgot I had. I was able to cut shelves out of them. Mostly. Some of the scraps I had to fasten together with glue and biscuits so they would be wide enough...

The problem is... that's not even close to the number of games I have on those shelves.
There's two more big boxes in my garage.
I'd put them in the top of my closet, but that's where my Dice Throne stuff is at...

I'd put them in the hutch in my living room, but that's where my Marvel United stuff is at...

Not to mention the drawers in my hutch which have been stuffed with old long-box board games, card games, dice games, and loads of gaming supplies like card holders and dice trays.
And so I'll probably just end up putting built-ins in half of the guest room closet. Because, seriously, just how much closet space do guests need? They're not going to be staying very long, so they won't be bringing tons of clothes with them any way! And, if they do, they can just stack them up in the corner or something. Not my problem at all if they over-pack!
Yeah. YEAH. YEEEAAAHHH!
Anyway... that's Board Game Week for you. Now it's time for me to stop blogging so I can play a round of Clank! Catacombs that I've been wanting to do all day.
I'm way too tired to think about blogging, but it cannot be helped... because an all new Bullet Sunday starts...now...
• Solo Funtime Gaming! If you've taken a look at my game collection at Board Game Geek, you'll have seen that there's only one game which gets a perfect 10 ("Outstanding. Always want to play and expect this will never change")... and it's called Puzzle Dungeon. It's essentially a more fun version of Solitaire. I originally had it as a "print-and-play" game, where you pay for a file that you can print out and play with. I fell in love with it immediately. Until my cards were lost and I couldn't find the file to reprint them. I tried to buy a printed set but, wisely, there were none available on eBay because people don't want to part with them. Except I recently found out that the designer, Brian Garber, has reprinted the game and is selling it on his Etsy shop...

And, let me tell you, I snapped up the Deluxe Box, the Expansion Set, and the Play Mat SO fast. I haven't played in years, and October 19th (the ship date) can't come soon enough. I really hope that his Puzzle Dungeon: Pets expansion gets printed one day. And that his other game, To The Death eventually gets reprinted, because I'd love to play that.
• Not Helping! One of the most classic of the classic BritComs is That Mitchell and Webb Look. There's been a hit of controversy over this 20-year-old show lately because the BBC cut out some sketches which were deemed "insensitive to modern audiences" or something like that. But the situation is a bit more complicated than that. One of the sketches was cut because Mitchell and Webb were in blackface. But the sketch was pointing out that the white people were able to overlook that the blackface was racist until the situation escalated, and it was the escalation which convinced them to stop and not the actual blackface. The ignorance is the entire point of the sketch. So maybe it's not that modern audiences are "sensitive" to it... it's more likely that modern audiences wouldn't understand it. I don't know. Since I'm white, it's really not my place to say whether it's racist, so I trust that the BBC looked into it by consulting those who can make that call. But in any event, Mitchell and Webb have been back for a few months with a new YouTube series called Mitchell and Webb Are Not Helping. I've been enjoying it...
I hope they keep going with the series, because their humor has had more than a few bits that were highly insightful and relevant even today, with this being their most famous...
Though there's talk that the BBC wanted to cut that sketch as well, so maybe I'm completely out of the loop? I wonder if this one was considered...
AND THEN... the state of inoffensive comedy gets a comment...
A new classic.
• Perfect! Verbi can be brutal. But always hilarious...
I've used Verbi to try and expand my vocabulary, and the app is never completely happy with your performance.
• Cash! A dollar is a dollar...
LOL. As insane as it sounds, I'm sure there are plenty of people wearing a band shirt who can't name any of their songs.
• The Mighty Thor! For the longest time, I'd see a guy named "Thoren Bradley" pop up on my social media. His entire deal was grabbing an axe and splitting big chunks of wood. And a lot of women shared his posts, which is why he was everywhere. But I never thought to follow him until he started sharing his thoughts on anything and everything. And it turns out he's a very smart thinker who can enunciate his takes on things very well indeed. Which really seems to piss off the "alpha male" contingent...
@bradley.thor Replying to @jimmynorris1971 ♬ original sound - Thoren Bradley
Whatever his sexuality may be, he's never going to stop having female fans, that's for sure...
@bradley.thor ♬ original sound - Thoren Bradley
And about that...
• Feeeemales! It's fucking incredible that this country is content to treat half the population as nothing more than birthing machines, undeserving of proper care when something goes terribly wrong...

This country hates women. Hates them.
• SERIOUSLY HATES THEM! A 20-year-old Cornell student says she was pressured into snorting ketamine at the Chi Phi house in Ithaca on the night of October 19, 2024. At 1:42am, according to her lawsuit, a fraternity member posted two words in the frat’s Snapchat group chat, Chi Phi Actives: "Free pussy.” The complaint says Johnathan Newell sent it. More men came upstairs after that. She says the assault went on until about 5:45 in the morning. More than four hours. These seven men are named in the lawsuit:
• Matthew Ingalls
• Johnathan Newell
• Winston Lee
• Gillio Lopes
• Diego Sarabia
• Scott Norris
• Scott Kretzschmar
She reported it to campus police on November 8, 2024. The fraternity was suspended, and so were those seven men, temporarily. Then, according to the lawsuit, Cornell offered them a way to “mitigate” what they’d done. Write an essay... yes, an essay. Those named deny any wrongdoing. This information was taken from a Facebook post, but reported in The Cornell Daily Sun.
And, on that entirely depressing note, I'm off to prepare for the busy week ahead.
I am obsessed with the game Marvel Champions.
It's thematic in a way that's next-level engaging... they've designed it so you really feel like you're a super-hero fighting bad guys. It's strategic in a way that's so much fun to play... you're making decisions not just for the moment, but also planning ahead to find a path to winning. It's highly flexible in a way that's surprisingly easy to manage... it's not overly-complicated to play and allows you to work with whatever hero(es) you'd like in whatever scenario(s) that interest you with whatever villain(s) that sounds fun.
But above everything else, Marvel Champions is a "living card game" (LCG) which means you're buying complete sets of cards in game expansions as opposed to "collectible card games" (CCG) where you're spending a fortune on random booster packs in an attempt to get the cards you need to build a great deck to play. I once heard the phrase "Pay-To-Win" used to describe CCGs, and it pretty much sums up my feelings on CCG games like Magic: the Gathering or Pokémon.
You would think that this would make Marvel Champions cheaper to play and, in theory, you'd be right.
But in practice that's not the case.
The game was designed by Fantasy Flight Games. That company is owned by board gaming giant Asmodee. For whatever reason, Marvel Champions expansions are NOT KEPT IN PRINT! Which is to say that if you want to play earlier hero decks like Captain America or Scarlet Witch, your only choice is to head over to eBay and pay insane prices to buy them.
And I have.
I've spent way too much money trying to fill in my collection... then finally had to stop because the remaining expansions I need are simply too expensive. Assuming I can even find them...
So... essentially I can't play most of the X-Men and can't fill out my Web Warriors. To do so would be $1,500 or more!
But it gets worse.
The Core Set comes with seven Standard "encounter" cards that get shuffled into your encounter deck. If you want a more challenging game, you can also shuffle in some Expert encounter cards.
As the game grew and expanded, we got "Standard II" and "Expert II" replacements for the originals. "Standard II" received some pushback from players, so we got "Standard III" as well. But the only way to get "Standard II" is to purchase The Hood Scenario Pack (around $150 new). The only way to get "Standard III" is to purchase the Age of Apocalypse expansion (around $100).
Having to pay $350 to get updates to an important part of the game because Asmodee won't keep the shit in-print is infuriating.
It's crap like this that drives me insane about loving to play board games. Why can't Fantasy Flight and Asmodee do reprints? And since it's just a bunch of cards, they could even print them with an on-demand service so they don't have to risk unsold inventory! Heck, you could even throw the old "waves" of content in combo packs! Put the six X-Men I'm missing in a single box and charge $100 or whatever! With more people discovering Marvel Champions every day, people would gladly... GLADLY... pay that.
But no.
What I'm not understanding is the logic here.
Surely there are players and potential players frustrated they can't play as Captain America (or whatever their favorite hero is), so they decide to not invest in the game. Which means sales Asmodee could be getting with minimal cost and effort are being left on the table. It's almost as if they are happy to drive the game into extinction as the heroes they have available get more and more obscure.
Surely such a fantastic game deserves better than that?
It absolutely does.
But here we are.
Oh well. The last semi-affordable piece of Marvel Champions I could find is headed from Kansas to me here in Washington State... via New Jersey, for reasons known only to the US Postal Service... so I suppose that will be the end of it. I'll just have to play with what I have and be happy about it.
