Blogography Logo


Sony FE 70-200

Posted on Tuesday, August 26th, 2014

Dave!I've never been much of a "telephoto guy." My favorite photography has always been landscapes and architecture, and these subjects have dominated my photos since Day One. With this in mind, I only rarely invest in telephoto lenses... often preferring to sink my money into the best wide-angle glass I can afford. Any lenses I've ever bought with any reach to them have been the cheapest of the cheap. While I may need a long lens one day... I know full-well that it will probably sit in my camera bag unused. They always do.

But with Sony's newer full-frame sensor mirrorless cameras reawakening my love of photography, I've found myself wanting to explore telephoto shooting for some reason. Throwing caution to the wind, I decided to get a seriously expensive lens (for me anyway) in the hopes that I'll actually want to use it.

Enter the $1,500 Sony FE 70-200mm...

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup
You know it's serious when it's painted white to dissipate the heat it generates with such big glass!

Now, let me preface the rest of this entry by saying "I know."

I absolutely know that 200mm seems like a pathetic amount of zoom in an age when even cheap hand-helds are sporting 60× lenses that blow in to a remarkable 1200mm. I mean, shit, 200mm can barely be considered "telephoto" any more, right?


These handhelds get their astounding reach because they have tiny sensors. A telephoto lens doesn't have to be very big at all to fill them up. Couple that with the slow, cheap optics these cameras use to get to 1200mm, and the quality of photos you're going to see may be decent enough for a hobbyist... but I wanted something more.

And with a full-size sensor, "more" and "quality" translates into a big, big lens. If you've ever watched a pro sports game, you occasionally see the photo-journalists covering the event as they stand behind these massive $10,000+ lenses that are so big and heavy that a tripod is required. And just look at what my little Sony NEX-6 looks like with the 70-200mm zoom...

Sony FE 70-200 on a Sony NEX-6 Body

Can you imagine what a quality 400mm or 600mm lens would be like... assuming Sony ever bothered to build one for these cameras?


Over the past couple days I've been goofing around with my new FE 70-200mm and have been loving every minute of it. Yes, the 200mm seems a little short on my Sony A7-S with its full-frame sensor... but on my NEX-6 with its smaller sensor I get 105-300mm, which is actually a pretty good range for a telephoto lens. Even at the low-end...

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Motel Sign

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Forest Light

But it's the high-end that really matters, right? Zooming in to the full 200mm (which is 300mm on my NEX-6) can get me fairly close. Close enough that a good-quality crop is available for 8×10" prints...

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

And you might need to crop in some cases because the corners can get a little soft at 200mm. Not so much that you're going to balk... or possibly even notice (this lens has amazing-quality optics, after all)... but it's worth noting.

As expected, the FE 70-200mm comes with Optical SteadyShot (image stabilization) built-in. Hand-held shooting would be really tough if it didn't. Overall, I'm happy with the quality of the OSS in this lens, and most of my shots were rock-steady despite my not being a very steady shooter.

Auto-focusing is generally fast and accurate, but can be frustrating at times. In some cases when I was getting close, the lens was simply incapable of pulling focus, even though what I was aiming at had no obstructions to confuse the contrast sensor... and I was outside the minimum the focusing distance of the lens (1m). I honestly don't know what that's all about, but it's something I'll be keeping an eye on.

The aperture runs f/4.0-22, which is fairly respectable. Though I admit I would've be happier with a maximum of f/2.8, which seems to be standard for this zoom range in other brands. I can't complain too much though... overall I find it plenty bright enough for daylight shoots.

And you can still get a nicely narrow depth of field, if you're into that kind of thing...

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

These were all hand-held with no shake and very good sharpness. Which is pretty darn cool, if you ask me.

You have to be careful though. In full-auto, my NEX-6 made some poor choices that resulted in occasional depth-of-field wackiness...

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

Which sometimes ended up being a good thing...

Sony FE 70-200 Lens Test: Mountains Closeup

Something I was not expecting was the bokeh you get with this lens. It's round! And really beautiful. The specs say that Sony used a 9-blade rounded aperture, which looks more natural to my eye than the typical polygonal patterns I'm used to seeing.

The size/weight of this lens is either really good or really bad, depending on your perspective. At 29.63 ounces (1.85 pounds) it's pretty light when compared to other zooms. But on a small mirrorless camera like my NEX-6, it feels absurdly heavy and positively massive (see photo above).

Other than that, there's not much to tell. I've noticed no chromatic aberration at all. Naturally, it comes with a lens hood and tripod collar. The build quality is very nice, and the lens is sealed to help keep out dust and moisture. Filter size is 72mm, which doesn't seem very common, but I don't have an inventory of anything that large, so it's not a big deal to me. There are four focus-hold buttons around the lens which is always good. You can limit the focal range to increase auto-focus speed at a touch of a switch. Lastly, there's a "panning mode" switch that adjusts the image stabilization to accommodate horizontal movement/tracking (a nice feature, but I honestly couldn't tell the difference when I tried it?).

Given the whopping $1500 price tag, I was prepared to be underwhelmed. How could it be worth that kind of money? But now that I have the Sony FE 70-200mm in my camera bag, I'm not underwhelmed at all. This is a quality lens that shoots beautiful images and provides good value for the money on both Sony's full-size and cropped-sensor cameras. It's also the only choice you have without going with an adapter, as native FE lenses are pretty rare at the moment.

Now I just need to get out there and take some pictures with it.

Tags: , ,
Categories: Photography 2014Click To It: Permalink


  1. martymankins says:

    Wow. Incredible shots. That lens dwarfs the camera body for sure. But that is a nice looking lens. Glad to see the quality matches the price.

  2. Justin Scott says:

    Not bad! Always funny to see giant lenses on tiny cameras. How has this affected your use of your Nikon DSLR, or am I missing something and you’ve totally moved on? I just recently got the Nikon D810 and am so far blown away with the image quality and this camera’s capabilities. I opted for a wide lens (35mm f1.4) since I already have an 80-200mm f2.8 (old school 1980s!).

    It’s clear that the image stabilization is working great here. So sharp even at such great distances. Pretty awesome! Have you thought about a support mount to connect the middle of the lens to the base of your camera? This can help prevent too much stress on the lens mount.

    • Daver says:

      I still have my beloved D90 with it’s wonderful Active D-Lighting that remains better at pulling shadow detail than most any camera I’ve ever seen. Problem is… it’s so big and heavy for travel that I found myself leaving it at home for most of my trips. My iPhone quickly became my primary camera, which was fine… but I missed the creativity that comes with a DSLR. So I decided to go mirrorless and get much smaller camera that I can more easily take along. Neither Canon nor Nikon’s offerings were close to the Sony NEX line, so I made the switch for my trip to Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. I was thrilled with the shots I got, so it’s been my primary camera for a while now. The only downfall of my NEX was the cropped sensor, so I moved to the new A7 & A7s and absolutely LOVE these cameras.

      But I do miss my Nikkor AF-S 35mm 1.4G! Even on my D-90 with its cropped sensor, the images I get are jaw-dropping. Especially night-shots, which are almost other-worldly.

      With Sony, the lens situation is pretty dire if you don’t want to go with a converter. I got a native Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 that produces *stunning* images… except when you’ve in motion with less than great lighting because Zeiss (for better or worse) doesn’t image stabilize their lenses.

      I have indeed thought about getting a support mount for the FE 70-200mm… but none I’ve looked at will work. My NEX-6 is too shallow to the tripod mount to use any existing models, and there’s no third-party solution I’ve found. On my A7 & A7s, I use a battery grip because they eat batteries like candy, so I haven’t found a decent third-party solution there either. Hopefully somebody will eventually bring a workable solution to market for me… in the meanwhile, I hold my camera by the lens tripod mount, which will (hopefully) keep things stress-free (as the camera is a fraction of the weight of the lens!).

  3. Nicole says:

    I’m envious! I’ve been wanting a larger zoom lens for awhile. I have a 28-135 but I’ve been wanting the 70-300 but it’s $650. I haven’t spent that kind of money on anything other than travel in years so I keep stopping myself. I might just cave soon though. I love taking photos at the zoo so the added zoom would be perfect for me.

  4. Vahid says:


  5. Seals says:

    I had a lens the same size when I covered sports. I used it for EVERYTHING, even group shots and grip-and-grins. I’d love to get back into photography now that everything is digital. That lens is the shit. Good stuff.

  6. Oh wow, I must have also missed your post about owning a Sony AR-7 having moved on from your Nikon. I’ve read such good things about them. I’m in the market for a new camera myself. I’d been eyeing the Canon 6D for a while but now wonder if I should save my pennies for a while longer and pickup one of the Sony mirrorless cameras.

Add a Comment


I love comments! However, all comments are moderated, and won't appear until approved. Are you an abusive troll with nothing to contribute? Don't bother. Selling something? Don't bother. Spam linking? Don't bother.
PLEASE NOTE: My comment-spam protection requires JavaScript... if you have it turned off or are using a mobile device without JavaScript, commenting won't work. Sorry.



Your personal information is optional. Email addresses are never shown, and are only used by me if a public reply would be too personal or inappropriate here. The URL link to your web site or blog will be provided, so only fill this in if you want people to visit!



Blogography is a place to learn and grow by exposing yourself to the mind of David Simmer II, a brilliant commentator on world events and popular culture (or so he claims).
Dave FAQ:
Frequently Asked Questions
Dave Contact:
Blogography Webfeeds:
Atom Entries Feed
Comments Feed
translate me
flags of the world!
lost & found
Search Blogography:
thrice fiction
Thrice Fiction Magazine - March, 2011 - THE END
I'm co-founder of Thrice Fiction magazine. Come check us out!
hard rock moment
Visit DaveCafe for my Hard Rock Cafe travel journal!
travel picto-gram
Visit my travel map to see where I have been in this world!
Blogography Badge
Atom Syndicate Badge
Comments Syndicate Badge
Apple Safari Badge
Pirate's Booty Badge
Macintosh Badge
All content copyright ©2003-2022
by David Simmer II
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under
a Creative Commons License.
ssl security